Every Indian kitchen uses spices daily. But behind that INR 10 masala pouch is a complex business: volatile agri prices, working-capital-heavy operations, brand battles on kirana shelves, and tight food-safety regulation.
Shyam Dhani Industries is coming to the market with an IPO, and on the surface, it looks attractive: fast growth, double-digit margins, and very high ROE. But dig a little deeper and you see big dependencies on a few states, a handful of customers and suppliers, aggressive leverage, and negative operating cash flows.
Shyam Dhani IPO review is written so that, by the end, you should clearly understand:
- How exactly Shyam Dhani makes its money
- What is driving its current profitability (and how fragile that is)
- How it stacks up against listed spice peers Madhusudan Masala and NHC Foods, both on operations and valuation

Table of Contents
Shyam Dhani IPO Snapshot
| Shyam Dhani IPO Dates | 22 – 24 December 2025 |
| Shyam Dhani Issue Price | INR 65 – 70 per share |
| Fresh Issue | 54,98,000 shares (INR 35.74 – 38.49 crore) |
| Offer For Sale | Nil |
| Total IPO Size | 54,98,000 shares (INR 35.74 – 38.49 crore) |
| Minimum Bid | 4,000 shares (INR 2,80,000) |
| Lot Size | 2,000 shares (INR 1,40,000) |
| Face Value | INR 10 per share |
| Individual Allocation | 35% |
| Listing On | NSE EMERGE |
Shyam Dhani IPO Valuation:
- P/E: 12.94x
- P/B: 4.41x
- P/S: 1.16x
- Debt-to-equity: 2.00x
- Current ratio: 1.16x
So you are essentially being asked to pay a mid-teens earnings multiple for a leveraged, high-growth, high-ROE spice company that is still very regional and very working-capital hungry.
Shyam Dhani IPO Review: How It Works, End-to-End
Shyam Dhani is a spices and grocery products company operating under the brand “SHYAM”. The core business model can be broken into four linked pieces:
- Raw material sourcing (agri-linked)
- Procures chillies, coriander, turmeric, etc. directly from mandis and suppliers across 17 states.
- Heavy dependence on Rajasthan for raw materials: 45.48% of FY25 purchases (and as high as 60.09% in FY24) came from Rajasthan.
- Purchases are highly seasonal (January–April harvest window), then stored in leased cold storages and warehouses for year-round processing.
- In-house processing and packing
- Single integrated manufacturing unit at Jatawali, Chomu (Jaipur, Rajasthan) covering ground spices, blended spices, whole spices and some grocery SKUs.
- Recent aggressive capacity expansion: ground spices capacity ramped up to 8,760 MT, blended spices to 3,120 MT, whole spices to 6,180 MT (FY25).
- Current utilization is still low post-expansion (FY25 capacity utilization for ground spices ~52%; H1 FY26 ~19%), which is an important point for future operating leverage.
- Product portfolio
- 160+ SKUs across:
- Ground spices (core)
- Blended masalas
- Whole spices
- Grocery items (rice, poha, rock/black salt, etc., largely traded, not manufactured in-house)
- Semi-perishable: shelf life 4–18 months across categories, which makes inventory management and demand forecasting extremely important.
- 160+ SKUs across:
- Go-to-market and customer model
- Sells primarily through General Trade (kirana/distributors) and Modern Trade (large format retail).
- FY25 revenue mix:
- General Trade: INR 66.81 crore – 53.58%
- Modern Trade: INR 55.25 crore – 44.31%
- Together: 97.89% of FY25 revenue.
- Geographic concentration:
- Rajasthan: 68.73% of FY25 revenue
- Punjab: 19.35%
- Combined: 88.08% of FY25 revenue.
Revenue Engines: What Drives the Top Line?
Product mix – Heavy Dependence on Ground Spices
FY25 revenue from operations: INR 124.68 crore.
Breakdown:
- Ground spices: INR 61.94 crore – 49.68% of revenue
- Blended spices, whole spices, grocery and others make up the balance.
- Grocery products (largely traded) contribute a small but rising slice:
- FY23: 2.51% of revenue
- FY24: 3.38%
- FY25: 3.84%
Implications for an investor:
- Ground spices are the economic engine; any meaningful slowdown or margin compression here will hit the P&L disproportionally.
- Traded grocery items add breadth to the portfolio but also add dependence on third-party manufacturers and extra working capital.
Channel Mix – Dominance of Trade Channels
The company is tightly linked to offline distribution:
- General Trade is still the largest single channel (53.58% of FY25 revenue), but its share is falling as Modern Trade ramps up (from just 0.43% in FY23 to 44.31% in FY25).
- General Trade and Modern Trade together accounted for 97.89% of FY25 revenue.
This is good for volume growth and brand visibility, but it also:
- Increases reliance on a limited set of key distributors and retail chains.
- Exposes the company to margin pressure from large retailers and trade partners.
Customer Concentration
For FY25:
- Top 10 customers contributed 56.39% of revenue
- The single largest customer alone accounted for 30.41% (~INR 38 crore)
A loss or slowdown from one or two large accounts would immediately show in the P&L and could impact inventory planning and plant utilization.
Geographic Concentration
FY25 revenue by state:
- Rajasthan: INR 85.74 crore – 68.73%
- Punjab: INR 24.14 crore – 19.35%
- Combined: 88.08% of total revenue.
This concentration is a double-edged sword:
- Positives: strong brand recall in core markets, dense distribution, scale efficiencies in logistics and marketing.
- Risks: any disruption (economic slowdown, regulatory changes, local competition, weather-linked issues) in these states can disproportionately affect revenue.
Shyam Dhani IPO Analysis: Financial Performance
| FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | H1 FY 2026 | |
| Revenue | 67.95 | 107.61 | 124.68 | 63.78 |
| Expenses | 63.87 | 99.22 | 113.98 | 58.19 |
| Net income | 2.92 | 6.30 | 8.04 | 4.20 |
Shyam Dhani IPO Peer Comparison
| Metric (FY25) | Shyam Dhani | Madhusudan Masala | NHC Foods | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from operations | 124.68 | 216.50 | 341.41 | Shyam is smaller but not tiny; both peers are larger national players. |
| Revenue growth FY24→FY25 | 15.87 | 33.46 | 63.17 | Peers grew faster in FY25; Shyam had a high base after 58% growth in FY24. |
| EBITDA margin | 11.65 | 10.26 | 4.30 | Profitability is clearly superior to peers. |
| PAT margin | 6.45 | 5.39 | 1.96 | Better net economics, even after interest and tax. |
| ROE | 41.06 | 16.99 | 12.18 | Shyam’s ROE is very high, aided by leverage. |
| ROCE | 39.00 | 21.97 | 16.88 | Strong capital efficiency vs peers. |
| Operating cash flow (INR cr) | (6.16) | (30.29) | (37.77) | All three show negative operating cash in FY25; working capital-heavy models. |
| P/E (x) | 12.94 | 13.7 | 9.37 | Shyam is priced slightly cheaper than Madhusudan, richer than NHC. |
| P/B (x) | 4.41 | 1.88 | 0.64 | Market is assigning a premium to Shyam’s book vs both peers. |
| P/S (x) | 1.16 | 0.76 | 0.13 | Again, a clear premium on sales multiple. |
| Debt-to-equity (x) | 2.00 | 0.74 | 0.55 | Shyam carries materially higher leverage. |
| Current ratio (x) | 1.16 | 2.07 | 1.75 | Shyam’s liquidity buffer is the thinnest of the three. |
Takeaway:
- Operationally, Shyam looks stronger than peers on margins and returns, despite lower scale.
- Balance sheet-wise, it is clearly more stretched.
- Valuation-wise, it trades at a premium to both peers on P/B and P/S, and only a small discount to Madhusudan on P/E while carrying more leverage and geographic concentration risk.
Shyam Dhani IPO Verdict
Putting it together:
- On earnings, Shyam Dhani is being offered at around 12.9x FY25 EPS, only modestly cheaper than Madhusudan Masala (13.7x) and richer than NHC (9.4x).
- On sales and book, it is actually more expensive:
- P/S 1.16x vs 0.76x (Madhusudan) and 0.13x (NHC)
- P/B 4.41x vs 1.88x and 0.64x respectively.
- On quality, it scores better on margins and ROE/ROCE than both peers, but carries more leverage, more geographic concentration, and similar or worse cash-flow volatility.
So you are not getting a “cheap” regional story; you are paying a quality premium for a company whose numbers look better than peers today, but where the business risks (cash flow, leverage, concentration) are also higher.

Conclusion
Shyam Dhani IPO review clears that the company offers a fast-growing, high-margin branded spice business with impressive ROE and operational metrics. But beneath the strong financials lie classic SME risks—high leverage, customer and geographic concentration, and negative cash flows. At nearly 13x P/E and premium P/B and P/S multiples, this IPO is not a bargain bet but a quality-at-a-price play. Retail investors must weigh the upside of brand-led growth against the downside of execution fragility. It’s a potential wealth creator—but only if the company scales wisely and manages its risks tightly.
For more details related to IPO GMP, SEBI IPO Approval, and Live Subscription stay tuned to IPO Central.




































